English

Common mistakes in comparing texts

4 mistakes learners make with comparing texts, each one named and explained.

All common mistakes

A comparison links how two writers treat one idea. Retelling either of them is not comparing.

A general assertion with no method behind it

What it looks like

A comparison concludes that both novels show the government is evil and people suffer.

Why it happens

It is a real idea about both texts, and at this level ideas feel like the thing being marked.

A worked example

Question. Compare how the two writers present power.

A common answer. both show that the government is evil

The answer. both make power feel inescapable, one through surveillance and one through the body

Why. The claim is about the world of the book; the mark is for how the writing creates it.

Put the two side by side

Assertion: the government is evil.
Analysis: the passive voice makes the state feel like weather rather than people.

Name the technique. An idea with no method attached cannot be evidenced.

Context listed instead of used

What it looks like

A comparison opens by noting that both novels were written in the twentieth century and are dystopian.

Why it happens

Context is known to earn marks, so it gets included, and the step of connecting it to the writing is the one that is missing.

A worked example

Question. Compare how the two writers present power.

A common answer. both were written in the twentieth century

The answer. writing after the war shapes how each of them imagines surveillance

Why. Context counts when it explains something about the text, not when it sits beside it.

Put the two side by side

Listed: both are twentieth century dystopias.
Used: post-war fear of the state is why the surveillance feels administrative.

Every piece of context needs a because.

The plot retold instead of the writing compared

What it looks like

A comparison reads: one novel is about a man called Winston, the other about a woman called Offred.

Why it happens

It is true, it is about both texts, and it is the part of the answer that is easiest to be certain of.

A worked example

Question. Compare how the two writers present power.

A common answer. one is about Winston and the other about Offred

The answer. both use a first-person narrator, but one makes power bodily and the other makes it psychological

Why. A comparison has to be about what the writers do, not about what happens.

Put the two side by side

Retelling: what happens in each book.
Comparing: how each writer makes it happen.

If you could write the sentence having only read the blurb, it is not analysis.

The two texts summarised one after the other rather than linked

What it looks like

A comparative paragraph describes text A in full, then text B in full, and never joins them.

Why it happens

Both texts get covered and it feels thorough, and writing about one thing at a time is easier than holding two in view.

A worked example

Question. Compare how the two writers present isolation.

A common answer. a paragraph on the first text, then a paragraph on the second

The answer. one idea, with both writers' handling of it side by side

Why. The comparison is the point, so it belongs inside the paragraph rather than after it.

Put the two side by side

Separate: all of A, then all of B.
Integrated: one idea, both writers, in the same paragraph.

Structure the essay by idea, never by text.

WAJD spots these patterns in your child's answers and names the one behind their wrong answers, instead of just marking them wrong.

More english topics